Howard Stern says he ‘hates’ anyone that votes for Trump: ‘They are stupid, I have no respect for them’

Long-established radio personality Howard Stern reaffirmed his stance on the former President this week, emphasizing that he dislikes supporters of the former chief executive, not the man himself. He underscored this point during a discussion about a recent statement by the ex-President on his social media platform, Truth Social, targeted towards Taylor Swift. Stern appealed to his listeners not to fall into divisive constructs of categorizing individuals based on if they align with their views or challenge them – a scenario Stern admits to encountering himself.

The seasoned radio host didn’t shy away from expressing his dissatisfaction with the ex-President’s politics and his conviction that his former leadership role didn’t suit him. However, despite the sharp differences, Stern insisted that his animosity doesn’t extend towards the person – but to his voters. The host found it challenging to respect individuals who backed the former president, branding this choice as lacking in intellectual depth.

Stern’s outspokenness on ‘The Howard Stern Show’ wasn’t without cognizance of the potential repercussions. Highlighting this, he voiced an expectation of backlash, including anticipated ‘hate mail’, from listeners opposing his political beliefs. Despite this foreseen friction, Stern appeared undeterred even if it would lead to losing half of his listeners, staying true to his principle of free expression.

The radio host used his platform to criticize the inertia of celebrities at the 2024 Emmy Awards. Stern criticized their reluctance to express disdain for the GOP nominee, expressing that enduring responsibilities should take precedence over fear of backlash.

A distinct part of the show saw an anonymous caller from Michigan draw a troubling parallel between the ex-President’s stance on immigration and Hitler’s infamous rhetoric against Jews. Eerily resonating with Stern’s position, the host agreed with this controversial comparison, stating the similarities in the strategies used by both figures.

The Michigan caller’s analogy led to a broader reflection on the historical implications of such parallels. Stern was particularly based on the initial nonchalance towards Hitler, who transformed from a seemingly harmless figure to someone who cascaded Germany into chaos. Arguably, Stern suggested that America could see a repetition of this pattern.

The conversation then took a somber tone as Stern observed similarities between the current political climate and the ominous atmosphere preceding World War II. Stern, expressing his fears, proposed that an unfavorable electoral outcome could spell disaster for the nation’s future.

Stern ended the show expressing his certainty that many opposed his political views and were eager to voice their complaints. However, he made it clear that he had no intention of lending his platform to conflicting views, asserting with a hint of pride that he perceived himself as more enlightened than his dissenters.

The bombshell discussion came just days after news of a second attempt on the former President’s life – a shocking incident that further fuels the national debate on political rhetoric and violence. The previous assassination attempt resulted in the tragic death of Corey Comperatore, a firefighter and supporter present at an Pennsylvania event.

In response to the assassination attempt, the former President highlighted the damaging consequences associated with inflammatory speech allegedly emanating from the left, which potentially put him at risk. He suggested the popular portrayal of him as a democratic threat could have motivated such violent actions.

For staunch followers of The Howard Stern Show, Stern’s stance on the ex-President’s supporters isn’t a new revelation. Similar thoughts surfaced before the 2020 elections, where he criticized voters for their inability to grasp the unfolding situation, particularly in relation to the pandemic and navigations within the Justice Department.

In recent years, the narrative surrounding Stern’s politics has evolved, with critics accusing him of endorsing ‘woke’ ideologies. Rather than deny the label, Stern sees it as a compliment – a testament against ignorance. The renowned host’s definition of ‘woke’ doesn’t necessary connote agreeing with the former commander-in-chief.

Addressing his position, Stern clarifies that aligning with the ‘woke’ ideology means he advocates for diverse rights and backs scientific breakthroughs like vaccines. If these cause people to categorize him as ‘woke’, Stern is more than comfortable embracing the label.

In a conclusive statement to his listeners last year, Stern declared unabashedly that if supporting the rights of the transgender community, backing the vaccine drive or not supporting the ex-President equals being ‘woke’, he wouldn’t shy away from the label. In his words, he’d rather be ‘woke’ than be dismissive of such important underlying issues.